Recruiting OB-GYN physicians

Your OB-GYN judgment, applied where it matters most — before the hysterectomy, not after

Paid, signed second-opinion reviews through SecondOpinionMedical.AI — asynchronous, record-based, on your schedule. Every application is verified against the NPPES NPI registry and screened against the OIG LEIE exclusions list before approval.

Why this specialty

Why Obstetrics & Gynecology fits the network

Few specialties generate second-opinion demand the way obstetrics and gynecology does, because so many of its decisions are irreversible. A patient scheduled for hysterectomy wants to know whether myomectomy, ablation, or a levonorgestrel IUD was genuinely ruled out — or never seriously discussed. A patient with a prior classical cesarean wants an independent read on whether a trial of labor is defensible. These are exactly the questions a board-certified OB-GYN physician can answer from a well-assembled record, without ever needing the patient in stirrups.

SecondOpinionMedical.AI retrieves the chart for you — operative notes, imaging reports, pathology, cytology history, prenatal records — and assembles it with a multi-engine AI evidence synthesis into a single reviewable package. As a medical second opinion reviewer, your job is the part AI cannot do: weigh surgical alternatives against a real patient’s parity, fertility goals, and risk tolerance, then render a signed, written opinion. Every reviewer in the network is NPI-verified against NPPES and screened against the OIG exclusions list before their first case.

For OB-GYNs, this is remote case review that fits around clinic and call rather than competing with them — a form of gynecology telehealth side income that uses your specialist judgment rather than your nights and weekends on a video queue.

Physicians arrive here searching for different things — “OB/GYN”, “obstetrician-gynecologist”, “gynecology second opinion”, “obstetrics case review”, “women’s health specialist” — and this page covers all of them.

On the platform

Representative case types

Hysterectomy vs. uterine-sparing management

Fibroid burden or refractory bleeding where the patient wants confirmation that myomectomy, endometrial ablation, hormonal suppression, or expectant management was appropriately considered before definitive surgery.

Endometriosis surgical planning

Chronic pelvic pain with equivocal imaging: whether excision surgery is justified now, whether medical suppression deserves a longer trial, and whether the case belongs with a minimally invasive gynecologic surgery specialist.

High-risk pregnancy and delivery planning

TOLAC candidacy after a prior cesarean, placenta previa or accreta-spectrum concerns on imaging, and timing-of-delivery questions where the patient wants an independent maternal-fetal risk assessment.

Abnormal cervical screening pathways

Persistent HPV positivity with discordant cytology and colposcopy findings — whether excisional treatment is indicated now or surveillance per ASCCP risk-based guidelines is the sounder path.

Adnexal mass triage

Ultrasound morphology, tumor markers, and menopausal status weighed together: observation, benign-gynecologic surgery, or referral to gynecologic oncology.

Recurrent pregnancy loss and fertility workups

Whether the evaluation is actually complete — anatomic, endocrine, genetic, and antiphospholipid workup — before the patient commits to assisted reproduction.

Practice fit

How it fits your week — and how it pays

Workflow fit

Cases arrive as complete, indexed record packages — no chart chasing, no prior-auth calls, no patient messaging. You review asynchronously, on your own schedule, and most reviewers work them the way they would a tumor-board prep: read the package, form the opinion, write it, sign it. There is no call coverage, no procedure liability, and no ongoing treatment relationship; your deliverable is a consultative written opinion the patient takes back to their treating physician. Reviews fit into the gaps an OB-GYN schedule actually has — a postpartum-visit no-show, an evening after a light clinic day — rather than demanding blocked-out shifts.

Compensation, plainly

Each case carries a per-case honorarium that is displayed before you accept it — you see the case type and the fee, and you take the case or leave it. There are no quotas, no minimum case counts, and no penalty for declining. Compensation reflects the depth of review a case requires; complex surgical-decision cases are weighted accordingly.

Board certifications we recognize for Obstetrics & Gynecology:

American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology (ABOG)ABOG — Maternal-Fetal MedicineABOG — Reproductive Endocrinology and InfertilityABOG — Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery

Questions

Obstetrics & Gynecology FAQs

Yes. Second-opinion reviews are consultative, not treating-physician relationships: you never manage the pregnancy, order interventions, or attend the delivery. Your signed opinion documents your reasoning from the records provided, and the treating OB retains clinical responsibility, and the engagement terms make the advisory-only nature of the opinion explicit.

You review cases consistent with your active, unrestricted licensure; the platform routes cases to reviewers appropriately licensed for each matter. During onboarding you list your licenses, and case matching handles the rest — you are never offered a case you cannot properly accept.

It depends on the record. A focused question — say, ablation versus hysterectomy in a completed-childbearing patient with a clean workup — reviews quickly because the package arrives organized and pre-synthesized. Complex cases such as accreta-spectrum planning or recurrent-loss workups take longer, and the per-case fee shown up front reflects that scope.

There are no visits. You never examine, prescribe, or message patients, and nothing is live or scheduled. You review an assembled record and render a written specialist opinion — closer to serving as an independent consultant than to running a virtual clinic. That also means no panel, no inbox, and no follow-up obligations.

Yes, and their cases are matched accordingly. High-risk pregnancy reviews route toward maternal-fetal medicine backgrounds, fertility-workup reviews toward REI, and pelvic-floor surgical questions toward urogynecology. General OB-GYNs receive the broad gynecologic and obstetric decision cases that make up most of the volume.

Across the network

Also recruiting

EndocrinologyOncologyUrologyFamily Medicine

Join the Network

Apply once — verification is the front door

Tell us about your practice on the product page. Every application is verified against the NPPES NPI registry and screened against the OIG LEIE exclusions list before approval. Patients only ever see verified, board-certified physicians.

Explore Second Opinion