Recruiting gastroenterologists

Between “scope again in three years” and “start the biologic” sits your judgment

Paid, signed second-opinion reviews through SecondOpinionMedical.AI — asynchronous, record-based, on your schedule. Every application is verified against the NPPES NPI registry and screened against the OIG LEIE exclusions list before approval.

Why this specialty

Why Gastroenterology fits the network

Gastroenterology decisions increasingly happen between procedures, not during them — and that is where second-opinion demand concentrates. A Crohn’s patient offered a biologic switch wants to know whether the current agent was truly optimized. A patient with Barrett’s and low-grade dysplasia is choosing between surveillance and ablation. A pancreatic cyst report has put a family on edge, and the question is whether the surveillance plan is proportionate to the actual risk. These are records-based judgments a board-certified gastroenterologist can render without a scope in hand.

SecondOpinionMedical.AI does the assembly: endoscopy and pathology reports, cross-sectional imaging, inflammatory markers and drug levels, prior clinic notes — retrieved and synthesized by multiple AI engines into one coherent package with the discrepancies surfaced. Your role as a medical second opinion reviewer is to weigh escalation against optimization, surveillance against intervention, and put your name on a written opinion. Every reviewer is NPI-verified against NPPES and screened against the OIG exclusions list before joining.

For gastroenterologists whose weeks are anchored to the endoscopy suite, remote GI case review is cognitive work that travels: no block time, no bowel-prep-dependent scheduling, no call. It functions as gastroenterology telehealth side income — but built on written specialist opinions rather than video-visit volume.

Physicians arrive here searching for different things — “GI second opinion”, “gastroenterology case review”, “digestive disease specialist”, “remote GI case review”, “hepatology review” — and this page covers all of them.

On the platform

Representative case types

IBD therapy escalation and switching

Crohn’s or ulcerative colitis with ongoing activity: whether drug-level optimization was exhausted before switching class, and whether surgical consultation belongs in the conversation now rather than later.

Barrett’s esophagus surveillance vs. eradication

Confirmed low-grade dysplasia or indefinite-for-dysplasia pathology — an independent read on surveillance intervals versus endoscopic eradication therapy, including whether pathology merits expert GI-pathology re-review.

Pancreatic cyst surveillance plans

Incidental IPMN-pattern cysts: whether imaging features and cyst-fluid data support the proposed surveillance cadence, EUS sampling, or surgical referral.

Chronically elevated liver enzymes

A workup that stalled — confirming completeness of the evaluation, the case for elastography or biopsy, and whether steatotic liver disease management is aggressive enough.

Post-polypectomy and screening intervals

High-risk adenoma findings with conflicting interval recommendations between physicians — reconciling the pathology against current surveillance guidance.

Refractory reflux and functional overlap

PPI-refractory symptoms with normal or equivocal testing: whether pH-impedance data supports anti-reflux surgery, or the picture is functional and surgery would disappoint.

Practice fit

How it fits your week — and how it pays

Workflow fit

GI second opinions are built from documents you already read daily — endoscopy reports, pathology, imaging, drug levels — delivered as one indexed package with an AI-assembled timeline. Review is fully asynchronous: no procedures, no prep calls, no post-op checks, no weekend GI-bleed pages. Most reviewers work cases in the time a canceled endoscopy slot opens up, or in the evening at the pace of one well-documented opinion at a sitting. The treating gastroenterologist keeps the patient; you contribute the independent judgment.

Compensation, plainly

Every case displays its per-case honorarium before you accept — no quotas, no minimum volume, no penalty for passing. Fees are weighted by review depth: a single-question interval review differs from a decade-long IBD record, and the posted fee reflects that before you commit.

Board certifications we recognize for Gastroenterology:

ABIM — GastroenterologyABIM — Transplant HepatologyAmerican Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) — Internal Medicine

Questions

Gastroenterology FAQs

Yes — the decisions under review are precisely the between-procedure ones: intervals, escalation, referral thresholds, and whether findings were acted on appropriately. Packages include full endoscopy and pathology reports, and when the images themselves matter, the question can be scoped to what the documented record supports. Your opinion states its basis explicitly.

Cases arrive as complete retrieved-and-synthesized record packages — you never chase outside records. A focused surveillance-interval question is a short review; a complex IBD escalation history is a longer one. The scope and the fee are visible before you accept, so the time commitment is never a surprise.

An active, unrestricted license, board certification in gastroenterology, and clean NPI and OIG verification — which the platform runs against NPPES and the LEIE before your first case. Case routing respects licensure requirements automatically, so you are only offered cases you can properly review.

Locums and tele-GI put you in live clinical workflows — schedules, orders, patients, liability for management. Here you render written consultative opinions from assembled records, asynchronously, with no treatment relationship. It is the difference between covering a service and being asked, as a specialist, what you would do.

Per case. Each case posts a fixed honorarium set before you accept it, weighted to the expected depth of review. There are no hourly logs and no billing — you accept a case, deliver a signed opinion, and are paid the posted fee.

Across the network

Also recruiting

Join the Network

Apply once — verification is the front door

Tell us about your practice on the product page. Every application is verified against the NPPES NPI registry and screened against the OIG LEIE exclusions list before approval. Patients only ever see verified, board-certified physicians.