Recruiting internists

Complex adult cases, assembled for you — reviewed on your schedule, signed by you

Paid, signed second-opinion reviews through SecondOpinionMedical.AI — asynchronous, record-based, on your schedule. Every application is verified against the NPPES NPI registry and screened against the OIG LEIE exclusions list before approval.

Why this specialty

Why Internal Medicine fits the network

The cases patients most often seek second opinions on are internal medicine cases in disguise: multi-system problems, long differential lists, plans built up over years by different hands. SecondOpinionMedical.AI matches those patients with board-certified internists who do the thing internists are trained to do — hold the entire adult patient in view at once. The platform’s AI pipeline retrieves the chart, reconciles it into a structured chronology, and synthesizes the evidence across multiple engines; the internist reads critically, weighs what the synthesis cannot, and renders a signed written opinion.

This is deliberately not telemedicine. There is no encounter, no panel, and no prescribing — the deliverable is your independent professional judgment in written form, and the unit of work is the case, not the hour. Hospitalists between blocks, outpatient internists with protected admin time, and internists winding down clinical practice all use it the same way: accept the cases that fit, decline the ones that do not.

Admission to the reviewer network runs through the same gate as every specialty here — NPI verification against NPPES and OIG exclusion screening before approval — because a paid second opinion is only worth what the credential behind it can prove.

Physicians arrive here searching for different things — “general internal medicine”, “internist second opinion”, “remote internal medicine case review”, “internal medicine telehealth side income”, “complex case record review” — and this page covers all of them.

On the platform

Representative case types

Multimorbidity treatment-plan reviews

Patients with heart failure, CKD, and diabetes managed in parallel — asked whether the combined regimen is internally consistent and what trade-offs deserve explicit discussion.

Diagnostic-uncertainty cases

Months of symptoms, an expanding workup, and no unifying diagnosis. The patient wants a rigorous re-read of what has been found, what has been excluded, and what has not been considered.

Unexplained laboratory and imaging findings

Incidental findings and persistent lab abnormalities that generated anxiety but no clear plan — a structured opinion on significance and reasonable next steps.

Polypharmacy reconciliation opinions

Regimens accumulated across specialists and hospitalizations, reviewed for interactions, redundancy, and questions worth raising with the prescribing physicians.

Post-hospitalization plan reviews

Patients discharged with a diagnosis and plan they did not fully absorb, seeking an independent walk-through of what happened and whether the follow-up plan is sound.

Practice fit

How it fits your week — and how it pays

Workflow fit

Each case opens as a finished package rather than a raw chart: retrieved records, an AI-built timeline, medication history, and flagged discrepancies. Your work starts at the judgment layer — the reading, weighing, and writing — not at the document-gathering layer. Opinions are delivered in a standardized written format, and the entire cycle is asynchronous, so cases slot into evenings, post-block days, or admin time without touching a clinic schedule. Case volume is entirely reviewer-controlled.

Compensation, plainly

Every case carries a per-case honorarium disclosed before you accept it, scaled to the record’s size and the question’s complexity. There are no quotas, no minimum commitments, and no figures published here — deliberately, because honest per-case work does not reduce to an income headline. You see the fee, you see the scope, and you decide case by case.

Board certifications we recognize for Internal Medicine:

ABIM — Internal MedicineAOBIM — Internal Medicine (Osteopathic)

Questions

Internal Medicine FAQs

Cases matching your certification and licensure eligibility appear for acceptance with the scope and honorarium stated up front. Nothing is assigned — you accept or decline each case individually.

It depends on the chart, which is exactly why pricing is per case rather than flat. The AI-assembled package — chronology, reconciled medications, flagged findings — is designed so your time goes to judgment rather than to locating documents.

No shifts, no encounters, no prescribing, no panel. You render asynchronous written opinions on assembled records. It coexists with full-time hospital or clinic work instead of competing with it for scheduled hours.

No. Your signed opinion goes to the patient as an independent review to bring into decisions with their own care team. You are not assuming care, coordinating treatment, or entering anyone’s call chain.

A per-case honorarium set before you accept — never adjusted after the fact. Complexity is priced in up front, and there is no expectation of volume. We do not publish rate figures; you evaluate each offer against your own time.

Across the network

Also recruiting

Join the Network

Apply once — verification is the front door

Tell us about your practice on the product page. Every application is verified against the NPPES NPI registry and screened against the OIG LEIE exclusions list before approval. Patients only ever see verified, board-certified physicians.